Chandler Jones led all defensive ends among regular season snaps with one,142,alternatively 97.9% of one,166 feasible snaps.
Rob Ninkovich was second with one,114,alternatively 95.5% of feasible snaps.
Andre Carter and Michael Buchanan (okay, and 14 snaps of Jake Bequette) combined for 293 snaps,or 25.1% of feasible snaps.
We know that third defensive end is a tough tremendous need,if not within case of injury, then to give Jones and Ninkovich more duration apt retrieve on an infant sidelines.
So I got to wondering how an infant Patriots compared to infant rest of toddler league. Using numbers from Pro Football Focus, I was able apt cater a hard quite basic breakdown among teams that operate out of child 4-3 defensive front, and how they dispense snaps to their defensive ends.
Note that this namely only a tough fast and filthy evaluation. It does never distinguish between subpackages with multiple defensive ends aboard a baby field. In fact, it reduces an infant imbalance of these violators as additional ends aspiration alter child starter snap ratio.
Using this metric, it turns out child Patriots weren't even the worst offenders of uneven snap distribution. They were newborn second worst with 88.5% of their defensive snaps attributed apt their starters - and that was deserving apt using packages more heavily reliant aboard careless third defensive kill (even more reason to fight for a hard DE3).
Leading the charge were a baby Oakland Raiders, who allotted 89.6% of their snaps at defensive end apt child starters Lamarr Houston an,049 snaps and 4th highest of defensive ends, 94.9%) and Jason Hunter. However, PFF only has a baby Raiders down for one,878 snaps at defensive end; an infant Patriots had 2,549 snaps- a horrible distinction of 671 that namely greater than child snaps by Hunter (633).
related articles：
No comments:
Post a Comment